(Can we have a "republish" invitation as standard?) |
(Query) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> |
<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> |
||
Addition of a page or even a parent's or child's name can allow a tree or descendant page to show more if republished. Not the sort of fiddle that the average reader would expect. We have "invitation to purge" for bdm pages; would the same idea work for tree and descendant pages? If so, I'd like to see it added at the top of each as the built-in standard. |
Addition of a page or even a parent's or child's name can allow a tree or descendant page to show more if republished. Not the sort of fiddle that the average reader would expect. We have "invitation to purge" for bdm pages; would the same idea work for tree and descendant pages? If so, I'd like to see it added at the top of each as the built-in standard. |
||
| + | {{unsigned|Robin Patterson}} in 2013 |
||
| + | |||
| + | Sorry I didn't sign it. Now can our experts answer it? --- [[User:Robin Patterson|Robin Patterson]] ([[User talk:Robin Patterson|Talk]]) 11:54, May 22, 2020 (UTC) |
||
Latest revision as of 11:54, 22 May 2020
Forums: Index > Watercooler > Refreshing tree and descendant pages
Addition of a page or even a parent's or child's name can allow a tree or descendant page to show more if republished. Not the sort of fiddle that the average reader would expect. We have "invitation to purge" for bdm pages; would the same idea work for tree and descendant pages? If so, I'd like to see it added at the top of each as the built-in standard. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Robin Patterson (talk • contribs) in 2013
Sorry I didn't sign it. Now can our experts answer it? --- Robin Patterson (Talk) 11:54, May 22, 2020 (UTC)