Familypedia
No edit summary
(Category/ies)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
  +
[[Category:categorization]]
  +
[[Category:Wikimedia projects]]
 
{{Forumheader|Watercooler}}
 
{{Forumheader|Watercooler}}
   
 
<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ -->
 
<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ -->
There are some conflicts between Wikipedia category structure and Commons. I propose that Image content (and related templates) use Commons cat structure, and textual content (eg:copied content from WP articles) use en:WP cat structure. [[User:Phlox|<span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">''<font color="#0A9DC2">''~''</font>'''''&nbsp;<font color="#0DC4F2">Ph</font><font color="#3DD0F5">l</font><font color="#6EDCF7">o</font><font color="#9EE8FA">x</font>'''</span>]] 17:40, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
+
There are some conflicts between Wikipedia category structure and Commons. I propose that Image content (and related templates) use Commons cat structure, and textual content (eg:copied content from WP articles) use en:WP cat structure. Of course we can tweak things as we go along, but cat redirects don't work like Page redirects, necessitating bot runs to actually reCat articles.
  +
:(On images, I agree with that. But text may be mixed: we have already moved - with your vigorous encouragement - to use the more logical Commons names for place-related cats, e.g. People from the United States. [[User:Robin Patterson|Robin Patterson]] 02:43, 28 October 2007 (UTC))
  +
  +
If functionally identical names and structure conform to neither, then we should have a good reason why. It creates a lot of needless busy work if we create cat structures different from commons and WP for reasons that are less than vital to the interests of the genealogy wikia. [[User:Phlox|<span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">''<font color="#0A9DC2">''~''</font>'''''&nbsp;<font color="#0DC4F2">Ph</font><font color="#3DD0F5">l</font><font color="#6EDCF7">o</font><font color="#9EE8FA">x</font>'''</span>]] 17:40, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
  +
:OK, sounds good in principle: let's list for discussion any we discover or have already discovered. [[User:Robin Patterson|Robin Patterson]] 02:43, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
  +
  +
==Cats that don't conform==
  +
*[[:Category:Copyright]]/[[:Category:Copyright tags]] and commons copy: [[:Category:License tags]] They overlap. (Commons for whatever reason uses "License" for all of their templates.
  +
*[[:Category:Settlements]] and [[:category:Municipalities]] (I copied the commons municipalities, but it seems underpopulated, and besides settlements seems better- more general, covering very small entities like villages that one wouldn't consider municipalities.) [[User:Phlox|<span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">''<font color="#0A9DC2">''~''</font>'''''&nbsp;<font color="#0DC4F2">Ph</font><font color="#3DD0F5">l</font><font color="#6EDCF7">o</font><font color="#9EE8FA">x</font>'''</span>]] 03:23, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 14:17, 16 May 2009

Forums: Index > Watercooler > Competing cat structures commons vs wp


There are some conflicts between Wikipedia category structure and Commons. I propose that Image content (and related templates) use Commons cat structure, and textual content (eg:copied content from WP articles) use en:WP cat structure. Of course we can tweak things as we go along, but cat redirects don't work like Page redirects, necessitating bot runs to actually reCat articles.

(On images, I agree with that. But text may be mixed: we have already moved - with your vigorous encouragement - to use the more logical Commons names for place-related cats, e.g. People from the United States. Robin Patterson 02:43, 28 October 2007 (UTC))

If functionally identical names and structure conform to neither, then we should have a good reason why. It creates a lot of needless busy work if we create cat structures different from commons and WP for reasons that are less than vital to the interests of the genealogy wikia. ~ Phlox 17:40, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

OK, sounds good in principle: let's list for discussion any we discover or have already discovered. Robin Patterson 02:43, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Cats that don't conform[]