Familypedia
mNo edit summary
(flagged)
Line 11: Line 11:
 
::*The consultation procedures can be here: [[User talk:AMK152Bot]]. -[[User:AMK152|<font color="blue">AMK152</font>]]<sup>([[User talk:AMK152|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/AMK152|contribs]]</sup>) 12:34, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
 
::*The consultation procedures can be here: [[User talk:AMK152Bot]]. -[[User:AMK152|<font color="blue">AMK152</font>]]<sup>([[User talk:AMK152|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/AMK152|contribs]]</sup>) 12:34, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
 
:Sounds goood to me. --[[User:TreeGenea3|TreeGenea3]] 05:44, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
 
:Sounds goood to me. --[[User:TreeGenea3|TreeGenea3]] 05:44, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
  +
  +
Flagged as requested :) -- [[User:Sannse|sannse]]<staff /> ([[User talk:sannse|talk]]) 09:33, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:33, 24 July 2008

Forums: Index > Watercooler > AMK152Bot, need consensus


Hello, in order for User:AMK152Bot to be flagged, it needs consensus from the community. The bot will perform maintenance tasks, such as fixing double redirects, standardizing categories, standardizing page names, etc. It will be much easier than performing the tasks manually. If everyone agrees and there are no objections, a Staff member will flag the bot. -AMK152(talkcontribs) 03:26, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Alright by me Thurstan 03:34, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
I have no problem with it. Will 03:46, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
If it works and makes life easier, then I'm all for it.Wittichen 04:10, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
I'm fine with that as long as the bot respects the consultation procedures in Genealogy:Bot policy. (I guess I will have to "unwatch" hundreds of watched pages before the system sends me too many emails about changing them!) Robin Patterson 06:22, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
Sounds goood to me. --TreeGenea3 05:44, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Flagged as requested :) -- sannse (talk) 09:33, 24 July 2008 (UTC)