Template talk:AlsoWP

Wikipedia "might" have an article
Th statement that wikipedia "may" have an article on a subject does not reflect well on us. What it telegraphs is that we couldn't be bothered to click the link ourselves. Wikipedia style guide comes down hard on such usage, admonishing contributors to Wikipedia:Avoid weasel words. If the contributor doesn't know that the WP article exists, the AlsoWP template should not be used. The prior text of this template stated:
 * "Examples include U.S. counties that are also cities, where the "People from" category is only for the city but our standard templates are on county pages."

It is unclear why this rationale supports making vague statements to our visitors on easily verifiable points of fact. Regarding use of names, familypedia place names MUST conform to WP names. London is both a county and a city. The 2nd level adminstrative entity has the WP article Greater London. The article that describes the locality is wikipedia:London]. The place described by [[wikipedia:City of London may be encoded in property "places-other".  All of these places may be encoded in concepts:  Concept:People from Greater London, Concept:People from London, and Concept:People from City of London.  20:00, 17 July 2009 (UTC)