Forum:Person article assessment

Previous comments
''Wikipedia has an article assessment system in which articles are assessed based on the chart. These articles are categorized by such, and the actual assessment is given on the page's talkpage. The statistics is gathered by a bot and placed in a table, a log, and a chart. Perhaps this may be a good idea to use for articles here, especially since there are many people out there and an assessment would be great to have in order to improve articles and show which articles have a lot of information. We could even make our own assessment process, rather than just using FA, A, GA, B, Start, and Stub, perhaps even more detailed assessment. Any thoughts? - AMK152 (Talk • Contributions) 22:44, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm going to start this. We may not have a bot (yet), but we have categories. I will create a template that can be place on the talk pages of articles of people. The categories will categorize them (Featured, Good, A, B, C, Start, Stub) and we could come up with the criteria for each rating. As the ratings reach A and B, they could be come Good or even be featured on the Main Pages. However, before we go and start the featured article section on the main page, we would at least need a list of articles to start as featured. We can start the featured article thign once thsi system takes off. - AMK152 (talk • contribs) 22:46, 13 July 2008 (UTC)'' (from Forum:Home page- Featured articles)

I have started a page here: Genealogy:Person article assessment. We need to create an assessment, as in, criteria for the grades of stub, start, C, B, A, GA, and FA articles. Of course, FA is will be voted upon and be featured on the main page. Wikipedia's assessment is here: article assessment system We could use Wikipedia's or even make our own. I have already created the template, we just need the criteria. - AMK152 (talk • contribs) 23:48, 13 July 2008 (UTC)