Familypedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive 1

Resources
Hi, ran across a couple of resources I stumbled across that might provide some more names for you:


 * http://marchildon.net/genealogie/RecentChanges -- a CC-BY-SA family wiki that is now overrun by spam, but probably has some salvageable content in its 3000 pages.


 * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taft_family
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taft-Lippitt-Chafee_family_political_line

and other things in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Political_families_of_the_United_States

Someone tried to delete the Taft family article; I restored it, but I thought you might want to have the genealogical information here in any case.

Keep up the good work! — Catherine (talk) 19:36, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Deletes
Just wanted to kindly point out that an admin's attention is needed at Category:Candidates for deletion, as several items have been tagged as candidates for deletion for some time now. —DeGraffJE talk 22:49, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Any admins following this? There are now over 40 items needing admin attention. —DeGraffJE talk 22:29, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Admin intervention regarding Fred Bergman
Fred Bergman's behavior on Genealogy:Requests for adminship and at large is unacceptable and immediate admin intervention is probably necessary. He's violating WP:F*** with profanity (see translation of |en|Ik%20hoop%20niet%20dat%20we%20dit%20gezeik%20houden%20met%20Jonathan%20DeGraff%3B%20ik%20zet%20hier%20eerst%20neer%20wat%20aan%20iedere%20nieuwe%20contributor%20wordt%20gevraagd%2C%20met%20name%20de%20welkomst%20boodschap%2C%20waarvan%20ik%20de%20kop%20hier%20neerzette%20met%20daarbij%20de%20vragen%20aan%20de%20nieuwe%20contributor%20met%20betrekking%20tot%20zijn%20talenkennis%20en%20zijn%20land%20van%20herkomst%2C%20waarvan%20ik%20vind%2C%20dat%20je%20als%20admin%20het%20goede%20voorbeeld%20zou%20moeten%20geven%20door%20dat%20dan%20zelf%20ook%20te%20doen.%20maar%20wat%20doet%20DeGraff%2C%20hij%20haalt%20de%20vragen%20uit%20de%20context%20door%20de%20kop%20van%20de%20boodschap%20weg%20te%20halen%20en%20daardoor%20de%20indruk%20te%20wekken%20dat%20IK%20hem%20dit%20zou%20vragen%20bekend%20te%20maken(quod%20non).%20Vervolgens%20haal%20ik%20deze%20vragen%20weg%20omdat%20het%20mijn%20vragen%20niet%20zijn%20maar%20vragen%20van%20de%20welkomstboodschap%20en%20wat%20doet%20DeGraff%2C%20hij%20plaatst%20ze%20weer%20terug.%20Ik%20ben%20al%20langere%20tijd%20bezig%20nieuwe%20contributors%20te%20activeren%20om%20hun%20babel%20en%20herkomstland%20in%20te%20vullen%20en%20eventuele%20niet%20werkende%20links%20te%20actualiseren%20of%20verbeteren%20en%20soms%20heeft%20dat%20effect%2C%20maar%20nooit%20kreeg%20ik%20negatief%20commentaar%20(behalve%201x%20van%20Jilliane%2C%20waarbij%20Robin%20het%20misverstand%20oploste).%20DeGraff%20echter%20verwijderde%20mijn%20bijdrage%20aan%20zijn%20userpage%20met%20bericht%3A%20%27%27%27vandalism%27%27%27.%20Dat%20komt%20me%20bekend%20voor%20van%20WeRelate%20met%20een%20achtergrond%20van%20de%20LDS%20kerk%20en%20laat%20nu%20toevallig%20DeGraff%20ook%20een%20website%20hebben%20waaruit%20blijkt%20dat%20hij%20voor%20de%20LDS%20kerk%20werkt%20!%20Is%20dat%20niet%20toevallig%20%3F recent post), he's engaging in serious personal attacks (in violation of WP:PA) despite prior warnings, he's vandalized my userpage multiple times, and he's engaging in offline stalking and harassment in violation of WP:HA. I've tried to be patient, accommodating, and forgiving, but my real life identity is now unfortunately involved. This cannot be tolerated, especially from a veteran editor; and from what I understand, this user has been temporarily blocked previously. Please assist! —DeGraffJE talk 16:53, 15 August 2009 (UTC)