Familypedia:Requests for adminship

Currently only one active genealogist is an administrator here. Anyone who would like to be given the extra facility that goes with being a sysop or bureaucrat may edit this page and "lobby" active contributors. See Wikipedia:Requests for adminship.

I guess one necessary rule would be for only logged in users being able to vote. &mdash;iFaqeer (Talk to me!) 00:26, 19 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Nominations of users by others
(Please tell the user and request that a consent be noted here)

Nomination of Jtc
I believe admin rights should be given to our most prolific current contributor, User:Jtc, if only to make his spam-rollback process easier. Robin Patterson 00:40, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)
 * Hmmm. I guess this is a very necessary next step; having more admins. Could have some discussion of this user, please?
 * &mdash;iFaqeer (Talk to me!) 00:26, 19 Sep 2005 (UTC)


 * Maybe one of us frightened him away? See his contributions

Nomination of Robin Patterson
I'd also like users to discuss Robin Patterson as a possible Admin. &mdash;iFaqeer (Talk to me!) 00:26, 19 Sep 2005 (UTC)
 * Accepting nomination. Robin Patterson 00:30, 13 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Yewenyi
Anyone who has contributed over 90% of the content should be an admin if he or she would like to be. Being Australian is no disadvantage; in fact it gives a better coverage of the 24-hour period in the fight against spam. Robin Patterson 00:30, 13 Jan 2006 (UTC)

I consent to be an administrator. Yewenyi 07:56, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

Nhprman
Currently the most active contributor. Stephen would be able to deal with vandalism much more easily if he was made a sysop. Robin Patterson 01:39, 16 May 2006 (UTC)